Friday, September 23, 2011

From good to great teaching in the New Academic Year



By Anis Haffar

Some years back, an international report about education in Africa decried the tendency for local educators to “infantilize” the youth.

In other words, many adults tend to believe that the younger ones are incapable and cannot be up to important tasks or ideas, and so the youth are consistently treated like small children. And true to the term, “Self-fulfilling prophesy”, the youth tend to think and behave like children into adulthood.

Many great educators recognized this harmful self-perpetuating cycle in their own localities too, and resolved to disabuse the minds of adults by understanding the ways through which children learn to think and do for themselves. One such educator was the Swiss psychologist, Jean Piaget (1896 – 1980). He is best known for using his own children to appreciate how the cognitive functions of perception, intelligence, and logic develop.

Piaget’s research resulted in three main books: “The Child’s Conception of the World” (1926), “The Origin of Intelligence in Children” (1936), and “The Early Growth of Logic in the Child” (1958).

Earlier, an Italian physician and educator, Maria Montessori (1870 – 1952) developed a system for the education of three to six year olds based, in part, on the “spontaneity of expression and freedom from restraint”. She opened the first Montessori school in Rome in 1907, and it became a model throughout the world.


In appraising children’s abilities in his book, “The Element: How Finding Your Passion Changes Everything”, Ken Robinson told the story of a little girl who habitually sat quietly in the back of her regular class. One day her teacher found her absorbed in the drawing room, and asked what she was drawing. Without looking up, she responded, “I’m drawing a picture of God.” Surprised, the teacher said, “But nobody knows what God looks like.” The girl replied, “They will in a minute.”

Robinson’s point was that children are inherently confident in their own imagination and abilities. It is only when they are “schooled” [and whipped, I may add] out of their wit, creativity, and confidence that they lose their natural God-given capacities.

An antidote to “Learned helplessness” is the concept and practice of education termed “Learner-centred” teaching. It prescribes a condition or rapport where both teachers and students learn from each other. It proposes a paradigm shift from the all knowing traditional teacher-types (glibly called “the sage on the stage” sporting a whip and a chalk, and stalking the class) to one where cognitive abilities are fostered and shared.

The concept is intended to uplift the status of the teacher; it grows, elevates and broadens class instructional activities to produce mutually beneficial outcomes. Led by confident teachers – from primary to university levels – each learner is considered a sovereign entity with a great gift, to be harnessed and used meaningfully. As time goes on, those gifts reveal themselves through the appropriate instruction.


In short, learner-centred teachers are expected to update themselves, lead the fold, and design experiential activities to advance their own growth, and provide opportunities for the youth to demonstrate their successes in achieving higher expectations.

The idea is to engage students in shared deliberations and to assure them that their roles are equally important in the teaching / learning process. Passive recipients of information, on the other hand, are subordinated in mind and spirit; and subordination creates lifelong dependency. The youth need to understand and articulate what is going on to avoid “growing” into functional illiterates.

Qualitative events do occur in classrooms and lecture halls; and they should be seen and appraised. Lead-questions help students to “see the bigger picture” of what participatory education is all about, and especially how people learn to learn. The following engaging prompts should be learning tasks in themselves:

• What did we do at the beginning of this session?
• What did we do at the end?
•How does the beginning tie in with the end?
• What happened in between?
• What does the class or group have to show for the time spent?
• If you were the examiner, what relevant questions would you pose at this point?
• What else can we do, later, to add to what we have done today?
• Are you prepared sufficiently to teach this lesson tomorrow to a mate who was absent today?

There’re benefits for using the “instructional processes” – the pedagogies, as they are called – as part of the learning objectives. It is essential, for example, that learners are able to articulate “How” things were done, and “How” those things can be done better, if possible. Such cognitive exercises help students to acquire the habits of mind for assuming the responsibility for improving their own learning. The focus shifts from what teachers traditionally want students to do, to what the students themselves need to think and do with or without teachers or parents present.

Teachers don’t only need physical types of help like passing out books, sweeping floors, and running errands, etc. They also need the cognitive types of help to make both teaching and learning much easier than we make them out to be. Life itself need not be unduly difficult. It takes commitment and practice to be the very best and at ease in any vocation.

Higher cognitive activities may start from the teachers’ prompts, but as time rolls on in the term, the learners themselves may use such experiences to evolve additional and fresher thoughts that otherwise lay dormant. The central idea is to bring as many divergent views and modes as possible into discussions and attitudes, especially into class activities.

Also, it is a good idea for teachers to encourage the youngsters to look out for, and bring into class, new and additional sources of information and materials related to the key elements in the subjects under consideration: for example topics relating to national development and social issues, science update, and international trends that have or may have bearings on the local situation presently or in the future.

There are useful extracts from some newspapers – not the daily insults of politics but relevant materials – that focus on the topics in the syllabus like cleanliness, health issues, e-wastes, environmental protection, eco-tourism, civic responsibilities, computer applications, etc. Many classrooms are short of materials due to the misplaced belief that only teachers know best what to bring into class.

Students should be made keen participants in the construction, evolution, and spread of useful knowledge. Hands-on experiences in the acquisition of knowledge help to develop neural associations that bond the brain’s many connections. For example: what we remember the most are not what we hear but what we do or practice ourselves? What we are told often goes in one ear, and pales out through the other.

Easy come, easy go; as they say. Learner participation helps in increasing long-lasting retention of knowledge.
Mere receivers hoard information in the short term memory, and lose them quickly. What we ourselves do, think, say, and experience directly are assimilated in our entire body chemistry. The mix of enthusiasm, performance and incremental successes results in neural associations with lasting positive effects. Conversely, fears, superstitious beliefs, insults, whippings and other forms of emotional and physical depressants scar the youth for years on end.


It is important for teachers, especially in “tradition-steeped” societies, to know that students ought to think about arguments, opinions, facts and options – in a non-hostile environment – in order to construct their own meaning, and make up their own minds.

Education is about the ever changing, fluid, volatile world; so learners need to have the dynamic experiences about it. It is not about merely repeating yesterday’s facts today and tomorrow. Learners think and do best when they see and participate in the learning process. The New Academic Year calls for a new beginning and a reflection of some of the best practices. The best practices transform the youth into productive, fulfilled adults.

[Anis Haffar is the founder of GATE Institute (for Gifted And Talented Education). He teaches seminars and workshops for schools – primary through tertiary – in “Methodologies for Learner Centred Teaching”, “Writing and Composition Skills”, “Literature in English”, and “Leadership”. His book “Leadership: Reflections on some movers, shakers and thinkers” is available in Ghana at Koala, Max Mart, Silverbird – Accra Mall, Kingdom and Legon Bookstores. (This article may not be reproduced without the author’s written permission.) Email: anishaffar@yahoo.com]

From good to great teaching in the New Academic Year


By Anis Haffar

Some years back, an international report about education in Africa decried the tendency for local educators to “infantilize” the youth.

In other words, many adults tend to believe that the younger ones are incapable and cannot be up to important tasks or ideas, and so the youth are consistently treated like small children. And true to the term, “Self-fulfilling prophesy”, the youth tend to think and behave like children into adulthood.

Many great educators recognized this harmful self-perpetuating cycle in their own localities too, and resolved to disabuse the minds of adults by understanding the ways through which children learn to think and do for themselves. One such educator was the Swiss psychologist, Jean Piaget (1896 – 1980). He is best known for using his own children to appreciate how the cognitive functions of perception, intelligence, and logic develop.

Piaget’s research resulted in three main books: “The Child’s Conception of the World” (1926), “The Origin of Intelligence in Children” (1936), and “The Early Growth of Logic in the Child” (1958).

Earlier, an Italian physician and educator, Maria Montessori (1870 – 1952) developed a system for the education of three to six year olds based, in part, on the “spontaneity of expression and freedom from restraint”. She opened the first Montessori school in Rome in 1907, and it became a model throughout the world.
In appraising children’s abilities in his book, “The Element: How Finding Your Passion Changes Everything”, Ken Robinson told the story of a little girl who habitually sat quietly in the back of her regular class. One day her teacher found her absorbed in the drawing room, and asked what she was drawing. Without looking up, she responded, “I’m drawing a picture of God.” Surprised, the teacher said, “But nobody knows what God looks like.” The girl replied, “They will in a minute.”

Robinson’s point was that children are inherently confident in their own imagination and abilities. It is only when they are “schooled” [and whipped, I may add] out of their wit, creativity, and confidence that they lose their natural God-given capacities.

An antidote to “Learned helplessness” is the concept and practice of education termed “Learner-centred” teaching. It prescribes a condition or rapport where both teachers and students learn from each other. It proposes a paradigm shift from the all knowing traditional teacher-types (glibly called “the sage on the stage” sporting a whip and a chalk, and stalking the class) to one where cognitive abilities are fostered and shared.

The concept is intended to uplift the status of the teacher; it grows, elevates and broadens class instructional activities to produce mutually beneficial outcomes. Led by confident teachers – from primary to university levels – each learner is considered a sovereign entity with a great gift, to be harnessed and used meaningfully. As time goes on, those gifts reveal themselves through the appropriate instruction.
In short, learner-centred teachers are expected to update themselves, lead the fold, and design experiential activities to advance their own growth, and provide opportunities for the youth to demonstrate their successes in achieving higher expectations.

The idea is to engage students in shared deliberations and to assure them that their roles are equally important in the teaching / learning process. Passive recipients of information, on the other hand, are subordinated in mind and spirit; and subordination creates lifelong dependency. The youth need to understand and articulate what is going on to avoid “growing” into functional illiterates.

Qualitative events do occur in classrooms and lecture halls; and they should be seen and appraised. Lead-questions help students to “see the bigger picture” of what participatory education is all about, and especially how people learn to learn. The following engaging prompts should be learning tasks in themselves:

• What did we do at the beginning of this session?
• What did we do at the end?
•How does the beginning tie in with the end?
• What happened in between?
• What does the class or group have to show for the time spent?
• If you were the examiner, what relevant questions would you pose at this point?
• What else can we do, later, to add to what we have done today?
• Are you prepared sufficiently to teach this lesson tomorrow to a mate who was absent today?

There’re benefits for using the “instructional processes” – the pedagogies, as they are called – as part of the learning objectives. It is essential, for example, that learners are able to articulate “How” things were done, and “How” those things can be done better, if possible. Such cognitive exercises help students to acquire the habits of mind for assuming the responsibility for improving their own learning. The focus shifts from what teachers traditionally want students to do, to what the students themselves need to think and do with or without teachers or parents present.

Teachers don’t only need physical types of help like passing out books, sweeping floors, and running errands, etc. They also need the cognitive types of help to make both teaching and learning much easier than we make them out to be. Life itself need not be unduly difficult. It takes commitment and practice to be the very best and at ease in any vocation.

Higher cognitive activities may start from the teachers’ prompts, but as time rolls on in the term, the learners themselves may use such experiences to evolve additional and fresher thoughts that otherwise lay dormant. The central idea is to bring as many divergent views and modes as possible into discussions and attitudes, especially into class activities.

Also, it is a good idea for teachers to encourage the youngsters to look out for, and bring into class, new and additional sources of information and materials related to the key elements in the subjects under consideration: for example topics relating to national development and social issues, science update, and international trends that have or may have bearings on the local situation presently or in the future.

There are useful extracts from some newspapers – not the daily insults of politics but relevant materials – that focus on the topics in the syllabus like cleanliness, health issues, e-wastes, environmental protection, eco-tourism, civic responsibilities, computer applications, etc. Many classrooms are short of materials due to the misplaced belief that only teachers know best what to bring into class.

Students should be made keen participants in the construction, evolution, and spread of useful knowledge. Hands-on experiences in the acquisition of knowledge help to develop neural associations that bond the brain’s many connections. For example: what we remember the most are not what we hear but what we do or practice ourselves? What we are told often goes in one ear, and pales out through the other.

Easy come, easy go; as they say. Learner participation helps in increasing long-lasting retention of knowledge.
Mere receivers hoard information in the short term memory, and lose them quickly. What we ourselves do, think, say, and experience directly are assimilated in our entire body chemistry. The mix of enthusiasm, performance and incremental successes results in neural associations with lasting positive effects. Conversely, fears, superstitious beliefs, insults, whippings and other forms of emotional and physical depressants scar the youth for years on end.
It is important for teachers, especially in “tradition-steeped” societies, to know that students ought to think about arguments, opinions, facts and options – in a non-hostile environment – in order to construct their own meaning, and make up their own minds.

Education is about the ever changing, fluid, volatile world; so learners need to have the dynamic experiences about it. It is not about merely repeating yesterday’s facts today and tomorrow. Learners think and do best when they see and participate in the learning process. The New Academic Year calls for a new beginning and a reflection of some of the best practices. The best practices transform the youth into productive, fulfilled adults.

[Anis Haffar is the founder of GATE Institute (for Gifted And Talented Education). He teaches seminars and workshops for schools – primary through tertiary – in “Methodologies for Learner Centred Teaching”, “Writing and Composition Skills”, “Literature in English”, and “Leadership”. His book “Leadership: Reflections on some movers, shakers and thinkers” is available in Ghana at Koala, Max Mart, Silverbird – Accra Mall, Kingdom and Legon Bookstores. (This article may not be reproduced without the author’s written permission.) Email: anishaffar@yahoo.com]

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

*Making Voluntary Service a Requirement for the Next President of Ghana - part1*




In this two-part piece, I will try to examine the elements that make an ideal leader and I choose to dwell on the elements of empathy, self-sacrifice and commitment as the most important measure of a leader. All other attributes emanate from these important and fundamental elements that must define leadership. Like in the Army, the most powerful leaders are those who in the face of danger fought on to save the lives of their comrades. Here, there is no eloquent debate and affluent campaigning required, just the demonstration of self-sacrifice on the battlefield. I do not understand why the leadership of the whole nation is not subjected to the same measure, to measure up to the single most important and high-order element of a true leader.


*SMART leadership for Ghana epitomized by service of empathy, self-sacrifice and deep devotion to duty*

Leaders are made, only a few are born leaders and even they have learned to prove themselves worthy of the trust of a sovereign people. A leader is someone who is invested with the collective will of a people, someone who must represent the best ideals and values of the society. To be a complete leader is to embody all of the hopes of the people within one's self and still maintain a normal demeanor and a balanced life. This is a huge task that is reserved for a select few within any group of people. In the past, leaders have been selected by a more natural method, based on demonstrated ability. The chief of a town is selected from the lineage of the man who first settled in the area and founded the town; here it is clear that such an individual is courageous, visionary and strong-minded. The leader naturally selected ensures societal cohesion and progress, because the best in the group is made the leader.

*Africa is the epitome of Bad leadership*:

The advent of democracy changed the paradigm of the natural selection of leaders and there are both good and bad sides to this development. The traditional context that is compatible with the natural emergence of a leader no longer exist but there is the need to identify and incorporate into the mode of selection of leaders the key elements in our current democratic experiment. There is nowhere in the world apart from Africa, that has seen such a wanton abuse of the democratic style of selection of a leader and the evidence is clearly demonstrated in the rampant armed conflicts, disease outbreaks and famine. In advance democracies, the political parties are hardcore nationalist whose only point of difference is the ideas and methods by which they aspire to develop their country.

The presidential candidate is therefore a tried and tested individual whose commitment to country is unquestionable. In Africa however, countries were founded by an arbitrary drawing of borderlines, therefore the idea of national identify and cohesion is still in its infancy. Candidate leaders mostly do not have a clear allegiance to their people and nation but are motivated by the trapping of power and position.


 *Leadership is not equal to political position*:

Leaders have emerged in Ghana and most of Africa who have acted against the national wellbeing. In recent past, some leaders in Africa have used state resources to wage war against their own citizens; many generations of Africans have been born in war times and passed on in war times. The use of democratic elections without the long and tedious process of creating leaders is in my view a very dangerous development. People purporting to be saviors of their countries have turned into monsters while in office, organized and won elections whilst their respective countries have continued to endure considerable decline. The sacred exercise of electing a leader for a country is demeaned and trivialized by a careless experimentation with the principles of democracy.

The world leaders who prescribed democracy for Africa did so, on the assumption that the undergirding and characteristically undemocratic institutions that prepare and present candidate leaders for election exist. Political office can be obtained by the use of money and even the use of force, it is sad to say that much of Africa reflects this quagmire. Many have been elected for important office for the mere fact that they had a lot of money to buy the number of votes to get elected. Election gangs have engaged in street battles to instill fear in the electorates, the use of ethnic origins of electoral candidates to predetermine the outcome of elections. Since the inception of the fourth republican constitution in Ghana, many regions of the country have consistently voted in a particular direction to the extent that only three of the ten regions have elected the leader at each election.

It has become the order of the day in Ghana that after every parliamentary session; there is a rare show of unity, where they decide to plunder the state resources in the form of ex-gratia for themselves. Many MPs come into office with a clear personal agenda to acquire all the wealth they have missed. I daresay that democratic election of leaders in the format being practiced in America and UK is not working for Africa; most people here see public office as a means to a personal end.

*You cannot lead people you are not committed to*:

Preparation and presentation of candidate-leaders for the costly process of election must be institutionalized with immediate effect in all of Africa. Political parties must create colleges of leadership that proactively screens every generation for leadership candidates. These candidates are trained for more than a decade using a strong nationalistic and humanitarian curriculum. One major element of this training program must take candidates to places that challenge their sense of comfort and endurance.

Take candidates to deprived communities; give them a small budget to develop those places from scratch, this will develop in them a sense of humanity and creativity. Above all, candidates should be screened also for their ability to empathize, self-sacrifice, endure and develop communities at a great personal cost. In addition to this, candidate leaders must be taken through a research and development project of a world-class standard, to create in them the kind of knowledge and skills that is pervasive in the developed world.
Leadership should not be all about eloquence and charisma but having a strong sense of the aspiration of the people they seek to lead. In the absence of such great scrutiny, many people will fight to come into office merely for trappings of the office, not having any sense of duty and even their sense of what is possible for their country is abysmal. I daresay that many African leaders are like this; they can use their country’s sovereign guaranty to secure expensive loans for foreign companies but will not do that for an indigenous company. Some even collapse the businesses of people who do not share their ideology and will not sing their praises.

*What proves commitment is voluntary Service that addresses the needs of the vulnerable in Society*:

During elections, the campaign is merely a talk show, mere words that is not a contract in any shape-or-form. The ability to ascertain whether a candidate leader is really committed to their country can be best done using their record of voluntary service, much like the appointment for an Army General based on the valor and skill shown on the battlefield.  The lack of a strong sense of urgency on the part of many African leaders is attributable to the lack of experience in voluntary and sacrificial service.

Many became leaders because of popularity and became popular through street activism and protestations. Even though activism involves a bit of self-sacrifice it is not the kind that creates the servant leader spirit, many “revolutionary leaders” changed into monsters the moment they tasted the comfort of office. What drove them into activism might have been hunger and deprivation and once the office made them comfortable they lost their passion to represent the people. In Ghana today, student leaders who organize their fellows to engage in disruptive social behavior quickly join party politics and continue their empty-talk enterprise and the generation of enormous public confusion. This is totally unacceptable, such fickle-minded, loose-talking young hunger-driven politicians will not allow themselves to be groomed to be servant leaders, they prefer rudimentary methods that is destroying our society and retarding progress.  


*The coming age of glory for Africa*:

In the part 2 of this article I will look at the leadership structure I think is best suited for a people in need of development and progress. A bad and ineffective leadership is a luxury that Africa cannot afford; I also advocate a leadership system that is stripped of all its affluence. I hope that this no-frills-presidency will attract the kind of people who understand empathy and self-sacrifice to lead the nation and occupy the highest office of the land. When we get the leadership question right only then will the glory of Africa show forth. The head is the body as the leader is the nation; fact is four out of the five senses reside in the head. The leader of a nation must represent the best hopes and abilities of the nation.

---------------------------- 
Patrick Kobina Arthur (PhD), 
parthur14@gmail.com 
http://pakar1-corner.blogspot.com/

Kindly edited by Gloria Baaba Arkaifie

Sunday, September 4, 2011

Mr. Next President of Ghana Give Science & Tech a BIGGER Chance!


What became of the promise of 1.5 % GDP for Science?

In 2008, I can clearly recall, during the presidential debate where the then candidate Atta Mills promised to devote 1.5 % of Ghana’s gross domestic product to fund science. This would have been an excellent development in Ghana, but the insistence of the moderator of the presidential debate, Prof. Ivan Addae-Mensah does not seem to have been a strong reminder enough. It has actually taken the present government three years to finally organize a national science congress, not to mention the zero funding provided for scientific research beyond the existing basal rate. Mr. Next President of Ghana, this country happens to be the only country we have, and making a determined and conscious effort at development is in our own interest.

All we are saying is give science and technology a real chance to change Ghana’s fortune and future. We have exported raw materials long enough; we have engaged in buying-and-selling for far too long and imported everything into the country all the days of our nation’s life. Moreover, we are still not making real progress. Therefore, we need the incoming president of Ghana to step back and take a long hard look at the developmental agenda of this country and realize that the big piece of the master plan that is still missing is science and technology. Most of us are not interested in which side of the political divide is in power, we care only about the supreme interest and life of the nation out of which we also have our lives.

The word “Science and Technology” is not even in the development policy statements:

It was exciting to learn that Nana Akufo Addo, the 2012 presidential candidate for the NPP was delivering a lecture titled “BUILDING A SOCIETY OF ASPIRATIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES IN GHANA – THE PATH TO PROSPERITY”. These grand policy statements are an indication of what the next president may have in store for this country when in office. However, a close up analysis of the 36-page document I downloaded from www.myjoyonline.comproduced a disappointing result. One that clearly indicates, our country’s real chance at development may be at best far in the future, or will be illusive for a longtime. The analysis of the occurrence of certain keywords is as follows:

Document is 36 pages and 10,671 words long.

*Science = 0

*Innovation = 0

*Technology = 2

*Research = 3

*Ideas = 4

*University = 2



Health = 6

Skills = 9

Economy = 50

Education = 42

Development = 34

The issue is that, there should not be any discussion of Ghana’s development agenda without the mention of science and technology. If the word count for “science and tech” is so low or even non-existent in the grand policy statements, I am certain it will not feature at all in the budget statements. The idea of infusing science and technology into the fiber of the Ghanaian culture must be proclaimed at every national meeting and then matched with real actions. The continuous emphasis on superficial economic policy plans to the neglect of specific action items on science and technology, which is needed to construct the framework that undergirds any developmental process, is detrimental to Ghana’s future. As Ghanaians, we need to make sure that our leaders understand development and progress in the true sense of the process. We need to do more of science research, innovation and development to define and build enterprises that will be the drivers of our development efforts.

Look at the six killer apps for the Western Industrialization (by Niall Ferguson):

ü Power of Science and Technology

ü Power of Modern Medicine

ü Strong Work Ethic

ü Competition

ü Property ownership

ü Consumption



Vital Scientific Discoveries and the Extension of Life Expectancy:

The discoveries of antibiotics used extensively to treat infectious disease revolutionized medicine and saved the lives of many people during the World War 2. The development of an effective vaccine for polio and many other childhood killer diseases has lead to dramatic reduction of infant mortality and increased life expectancy in many poor African countries. However, these excellent developments were wholly achieved by Western countries and institutions with little or no participation of the beneficial African countries. Interestingly, these essential vaccines come to us as heavily subsidized.

There are many other diseases in African countries that are referred to as “neglected tropical diseases”, e.g. Buruli ulcer. There are currently no effective diagnostics and treatment for these diseases because the sufferers are mostly poor people living in rural areas. This is where national science policy needs to make the difference in confronting such difficult situations that are retarding our development. The western countries cannot do it for us anymore, we must deal with it ourselves and yes we have the resources but for the lack of effective leadership.



The Need for a New Composite Ghanaian Culture:

It is time to introduce new materials into the cultural fabric of this country; the result of what we have now is high burden of disease, poverty and deprivation. It is time to introduce new ideas to create the new composite culture that is high in the understanding and skills of science and technology. We have educated the young in Ghana that, their culture is only about drumming and dancing, this is all we did during our time in the cultural studies class. Whenever there is an event in Ghana the musical interlude in christened “cultural display”, as if life is all about dancing and drumming. This does not pertain anywhere in the world, the Ghanaian culture needs to change into a composite one that is embedded with the concepts of science and technology and move beyond the mere rhetoric.

If culture is defined as “the way a group of people live”, then it stands to reason that ‘how we treat diseases is culture, extending life expectancy is culture, industrial and technological innovativeness is culture and scientific breakthroughs is culture too. So are strong work ethic, empathy (I am because you are – NOT each one for himself), powerful vision, dedication to accomplish the impossible, creativity and improved lifestyle. We as a people do not owe our lives to our traditions and past practices and norms; the human spirit craves light and happiness and cannot wait. Many Ghanaians have joined other cultures and released their creative powers, a clear demonstration that the potential is there but cultural framework is holding us captive. This is why we need a leader who gets it when it comes to the importance of science and technology for development.

Science and Technology Centered Development Agenda for Ghana:

There is the need to change the focus of all science and technology programs in Ghana’s universities and polytechnics from merely academic programs and departments into direct enterprise generating units. Each faculty should be hired to be a part of a specific team with a clear mandate to develop a specific project, higher education should be through such systems and the problem of graduate employment will reduce. Where is the Starch Factory under the president’s special initiative? Moreover, why are most MASS-Transit buses broken down? We need to back these national projects with strong institutions with mandate to supply technical and scientific advancement.

Staff of research institutes should be mostly made of graduate students who contribute to projects as part of their training, research suffers when most of the members of staff are permanent. Permanent staffing inhibits initiative and innovation since people quickly settle into tasks they are comfortable with, besides their salaries would be paid at the end of the month. Ghana is endowed with many intelligent young people, what is lacking is leadership that will assemble them into indomitable and productive teams to attack projects with a strong sense of purpose and urgency.
Combined Team of Nigerian and UK Engineers building the NigeriaSat - X

The first pictures of the NigeriaSat - X, satellite for disaster relief and prevention, Urban planning and development.

STEMS is good for Development and STEMS is good for Ghana:

South Korea along with many of the Asian countries has steadily invested in science, technology, engineering, mathematics and statistics (STEMS) and the result is clear. We need leadership to tap into the huge Ghanaian Diaspora of STEMS professionals to help Ghana and Africa leapfrog the early transitional difficulties. These people will provide a strategic mechanism for re-engineering the Ghanaian culture that is so impervious to the acquisition of the understanding and skills of science and technology.
Nigeria recently sent another satellite (NigeriaSat-2 and NigeriaSat-X) into orbit, the wonderful thing is a joint team of UK and Nigerian engineers constructed the satellite. This is the great way of building local capacity and inspiring the young generation to aspire and place their talents in new and emerging fields. Ghana missed a great opportunity with the FPSO construction in Singapore; it would have been great if a number of Ghanaian engineers had been attached to the project.

----------------------------
Patrick Kobina Arthur (PhD),
parthur14@gmail.com
http://pakar1-corner.blogspot.com
/


Kindly edited by Gloria Baaba Arkaifie