Sunday, November 28, 2010

Rationalizing The Strategic Priorities of National Development

Why is There the Need to Rationalize the Strategic Priorities of National Development?
Human history and evolution is synonymous with the evolution of political systems and in many cases the differences in the various systems has been the cause of wars that claimed many lives. The objectives of many of these wars were to ensure the maintenance of supremacy and domination even though the inherent objective of such opposing political systems has rather been  the same. The human spirit and desire for happiness, dignity and honor is the same and preserved in all cultures and political systems be it Marxism or capitalism. It is also evident in human history that the fear of the enemy from the outside has far more power to incite a community of people to rise up than the fear of the enemy within that community. This is even more the case regardless of the net effect of both sources of threat. Contemporary history of many nations, big and small lends a considerable support to this assertion, in that, nations have gone to war over threats that was estimated to affect about a million citizens whilst a failure of leadership that lead to hunger and disease outbreaks decimating tens of millions of citizens didn't invoke any response at all. In this article we seek to point out a number of common grounds shared by some of the most bitterly opposed political systems especially in regard to the defense sector and to leverage such unlikely commonalities by advocating for a reorientation and reorganisation of thoughts and systems that operate in three critical sectors of our national life, these sectors are manpower development, health and agriculture.
 National Targets for the Various Specialties in Manpower Development.
National development should require ALL MANNER of SKILLS to make things happen, therefore the education system should be so designed based on the number of specialised skills needed and the respective quantum. Failure to establish this will lead to the situation where students drift into courses that they perceived to be 'cool' and readily employable. I have a first hand experience from my encounters with students which has left me very concerned about their preferences in terms of various specialties of skills acquisition. Apart from the fact that an overwhelming majority of each graduating year group pursue arts and business over science and technology. There is a rather disturbing trend of a large proportion of the already few science and technology students preferring to switch to the arts and business courses later in life. There is therefore the need for a national policy that clearly states the levels of the different specialties required for national development.


Also there is the need to compile a nation-wide data on students in the different study areas, so that we can compare that to the targets and see the way forward. A casual observation suggests that over 80% of each graduating year undertake arts and business (almost all students in the private universities study business). The reason why something needs to be done urgently is that majority of these science students especially are now studying science in an absent-minded mode. If indeed all manner of craftsmanships are needed for development, then this current trend needs reversing and leadership should take this up. The situation in departments for the sciences is that the level of laboratory equipment and reagents are far lower than number of students and the quality of training they deserve. To determine the number of students to be directed into different courses at the post-secondary level, I want to propose the ratios for specialty target setting  in four major categories as follows:
Proportion specialties in four major skills categories: 
Discovery and Design Specialties  - 30 %
Enterprise, Innovation and Development - 50 %
Market - 10 %
Administration - 10 %

Description of the four major categories:

Discovery and Design Specialties: Natural Sciences, Agriculture, Engineering, Mathematics, Statistics, Geography.

Enterprise, Innovation and Development Specialties: Engineering, Natural Sciences, Medical Sciences, Agriculture,  Mathematics, Statistics, Vocational Skills and Performing and Visual Arts.

Market Specialties: Business, Economics, Social and Political studies

Administration Specialties: Governance, Social and Political studies
During war time, the military academies do not watch the trainees decide the specialties they fancied but rather group them based on their assessed abilities and the needs of the army. This is really the most accurate and effective measure regardless of whether such an army is in the most capitalist USA or the most communist Russia or China. Imagine most army recruits choosing to be snipers because one is not likely to face direct fire, so there is an army of ten thousand strong men and all are snipers? There is a generation of youth in this country who only fancy working in the banks and closely related office jobs and by this drawing all the best talents into jobs that do not really need that kind of talent. This country has a shortfall of all its critical needs, such as clean water, energy supply, food supply, sanitation and health care, and yet the majority of the youth acquiring training wish to work in an office and in a Bank??? How does this solve any of these shortfalls???
Returning to Good Health and Staying Healthy
A productive population is one that is not only well trained but also healthy and grows stronger. The state of the health sector in this country is one that needs alot of work to improve. Returning people to good health, receiving the newborn into their new life, should not be an enterprise that is monetized nor be controlled by commercial interests. Society should make the health of its members a high priority that deserves a robost system which does not demand individuals to make payments to access health services. The situation where health practionationers are concentrated in the most commercially viable cities is clearly opposed to the idea of ensuring good health for all members of society.  As a country there is the need to determine the number of hospitals that will ensure every citizen can have access, not just provide health facilities where and when we can. This will only create the condition of low life expectancy and low quality of life which could have easily triggered a war if the same was caused by an external element. A country will judge an act as an aggression and readily launch a full scale war should a neighbouring country attack its city and kill hundred people. The cost of the ensuing war will easily surpass the cost of building hospitals that will save the lives of more than thousand people and yet we find this happening. What is it about leaders that make them rate external threats far higher than internal ones that are preventable and curable at a reduced cost??? The provision of good shelter is also a matter that promotes good health and it should be resetting the strategic priorities to make sure that there is shelter for every one before society spends resources to put up expensive buildings that serve only ecstatic purposes. A few beautiful buildings do not make any country great when majority of citizens put up in places similar to that for farm animals. Why should we have to use so much money to put up two towers near the airport when the same sum of money could easily have given a suburb of Accra (which is at best about 90 % a slum settlement) a significant makeover.

Putting Food on the Table and Assurance of Food Security
As a basic human need, food supply should be a first choice priority item just like training and health. In many established countries, agriculture is fully paid for with taxes so the farmers do not have to wait for harvest to earn a living. So many subsidies are pumped into agriculture, that food prices are consistently low and this arrangement is never opened for discussion even if they turn around to force other countries to stop subsidising their agriculture in the name of opened market economy. Meanwhile their economy is only opened to commodities that cannot be grown in sufficient quantities in that country. The agriculture sector should be managed with a military type set up, where a service is created that recruit an elite and talented set of people who are trained to manage the various agricultural activities. The country zoned systematically to make use of the productives of the different arable lands and develop efficient irrigation system to ensure all year round farming and production. The development of all upstream industries should be done in a way that allows the maximisation of all the primary production effort.
It is all possible? Yes!
I greatly admire the military system in every country because no matter what the political system and culture of that nation is, their army shares strong similarities to any other army in the world. They take their activities extremely seriously because their lives are involved, if a rocket squad is poorly trained and are careless with their armament, the effect will be a massive destruction of the army itself and then the larger society. On the other hand mainstream training institutions donot feel the same way because they are only required to award certificates and not to provide the assurance to society that trained persons will deliver on their set targets. A country that crucially needs development should set it priorities with a military attitude, because here too lives are at stake albeit from an internal and indirect threat. The  human spirit should soar high over poverty and not settle for easier options onlybecause it is not an obvious external threat. My message is that please wake up because the value is the same or even worse. 

And yes it all possible.
--------------------------------------------
Patrick Kobina Arthur (PhD),
parthur14@gmail.com


Kindly edited by Gloria Baaba Arkaifie

13 comments:

  1. Whether political ideologies are political systems is just beside the point of this article

    Granted that ideologies are not necessarily system, an ideology takes a its life in a system. The point I really want to make it that whether in a capitalist/democratic or communist country the attitude of their army is the same. And I want to use this picture to address the problem of development, where basic needs have to be met with a military attitude. Safety and security which is the business of the armed forces is not more important than the provision of health, food, shelter and education.

    So society must deal with these with the same military attitude.

    The opposite is currently the case.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the engaging dsicussion.
    By attitude I mean how the army does its business and I can illustrate with the point of how recruitment is done. Whether in the USA or China, citizens donot have any choice but to join the army during war time if they are fit. Secondly the budget of the army is top secret whether it US or China. So by attitude I mean their objectives comes first to individual freedoms and preference but in civil life a doctor can report to work at 11 am and leave sick people waiting in line for 3-4 hours but this will not happen is the Army of any country.

    ReplyDelete
  3. My main point is this article to ask whether we need to direct the number of young people proportionally into the different fields of specialisations needed for effective development?

    All I see now is a passive drift of the youth into "cool" and easy courses without checking how many of such specialties are actually needed, so that can diversity early enough.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hello
    I just read your post on www.peacefmonline.com: "Ghana's OIL Will Not Make Any Difference" and find it interesting that we share the same view which is that empathy, respect and a bit selflessness are key to creating wealth and prosperity.

    However, I do think that Ghana's oil will make a huge difference if the people of Ghana embrace one another as friends and family.

    Ghana must learn from Nigeria's experience because it will be a great shame if the government fail to plan and the people become selfish. Read my comment.

    I wrote a short article on the need for Ghana to have taken more time to benchmark economic and social impact of oil drilling in Nigeria in order to create and work from a better template.

    http://osakiworld.blogspot.com/2010/12/ghana-and-oil-has-any-lesson-been.html#more

    Take a look.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Austin,

    Great that we share similar ideas, as simple as empathy is, its actually a powerful force. Being able to put yourself in someone else's place and to use the powers and the position society gives to provide solutions for people before they even needed.

    Cheers

    Patrick

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mr. Writer, your distribution of the nation’s priority is fine but my problem is the few of us in the targeted areas (INNOVATION, SCIENCE AND TECHN. RESEARCH) are not doing well simply because there is lack of resource. Lack of basic equipment and motivation is the cause. I think some of these situations demoralize us. We need government intervention.

    ReplyDelete
  7. the problem starts from the scratch as usually. lack of resources and motivation. the mantle lies on the individual as the government is not prepared to do much.

    ReplyDelete
  8. We need to set our priorities strait. We must change our mindset and try to exploit our God given talent. How can someone who is so good at inventing electronic devices end up as a general manager of an export company? We must look at our development goals and prioritize our aim. How can we channel resources and money into areas that would in the end be of short term use. Developing agriculture, education and health systems will certainly improve the standard of living of our people and we can call this development. there's a local saying which goes "No one uses the left hand to point the father's house" let us wake up and smell the coffee; we are the cause of our own downfall.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This is a great article. It seems to cover every sector in the country. I hope some people in high places are reading this. Maybe you should be in our political setting.
    It is a true observation you have made about today’s’ youth. There is suddenly a great quest for wealth and any means that would help achieve this is quickly embraced. A reorientation is vital if the current situation is to be salvaged. Misplaced priorities must be set straight.
    The future of every nation is the youth and so their development should be the priority of the nation.

    ReplyDelete
  10. First our culture should be changed. Students should be grouped based on capabilities and interest, believe me the results would be positive. In order to reduce import, we must take every activity seriously as though our lives were at stake. About students going for the easy way out and office job, it is because of the mentality that has been engraved on them. Even with science students, the first thing on most minds is to become a Medical Doctor. I think as part of the school curriculum students should be psyched to know how much we need scientists in various fields to help build the nation. Also, they should be made to understand that this could be achieved not only through office work but mainly through field work and this would exploit more talents.

    ReplyDelete
  11. In these days of economic hardship, 7 out of 10 Ghanaians will go in for businesses that will fetch income in the shortest possible time. In Ghana we have been brainwashed with the idea that, if you are not a banker, lawyer or doctor, then you are not successful. Funny though, but this has gone a long way in affecting the thoughts of our young and up coming scientists. Looking at the statistics is really disturbing, that a country like Ghana has still not come to terms with the fact that science and technology is the master key. Science has not been given that much hype it deserves other than that we would have long realized that, with the scientific mindset not only will the man power sector be combated but our health and agriculture status will be vastly improved.
    A look at the six killer apps, shows how determined our counterparts are to promote science and technology, however can the same be said about us?
    Another reason is the lack of maximum publicity about science oriented occupations other than being a doctor. This can be seen in the psychological breakdown students go through when they miss out on the chance to study medicine.

    ReplyDelete
  12. A good planning is very pertinent for development. The careful plan and design of long DNA material to fit into the small nucleus by God, to yield such a tremendous result as man, stipulates the essence of a good plan. when our governance has a good plan, the results yield great development in all sectors of the economy, be it educational, financial, agricultural, cultural to mention a few. we should all learn to have a good plan in life, only then would we experience great results.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Targets and priorities are set to achieved but just to be spoken about.Practicality dependents resources both human and natural resources. Lets change our mind set first, get all put all necessary resources in place and now talk of prioritizing.

    ReplyDelete