Questions for the undercover agent Anas:
1. How many other reports have not been released for some reasons?
2. What is the proof that the raw footages have not been spliced together to favor the undercover agent’s selected narratives?
3. Is there a recording of the desktop processes leading to the creation of the video that was shown to the public?
4. Has there been an independent and transparent review of the validity of the video editing process to assure public that they are not being fooled?
5. Do you and your people accept that past results do not guarantee future performance? As the investment companies say? That the Anas we knew years ago maybe using the public trust for personal benefits now?
6. How do we guarantee that the citizens do not become the ultimate victims?
7. Can you open your source data for open and independent accreditation?
8. Can you upload all the raw footages for public scrutiny?
9. Did your team acquire a Broadview video recording that allows independent analysis to ascertain that those caught are not being help to ransom by a one sided video?
10. Were the baits recognized investors or they were actors?
11. The fight against corruption and abuse of power, wouldn’t it be better to use asset declarations and compulsory investigations into unexplained wealth as the accepted method?
Rather than a whole nation relying on a “sacred dark agent”?
12. It’s been 20 years of Anas undercover reports, isn’t it time to move to a more appropriate method of dealing with corruption?
13. Shouldn’t all person’s in the chain of custody and stewardship be required to swear with their lives to ensure that all cases of corruption will be dealt with?
Just like Prison Officers and Arms depot officers held liable for the prisoners and armament in their custody?
#undercoverQuestions
